RepCheck
Challenges we solve
Our RepCheck & Message Recall Solutions
Our research is based on cutting-edge international methodologies, as well as our own original innovations and IT.
Our RepCheck & Message Recall Research Process
Our Pharmaceutical Research Experience
Real results, real impact
ALL casesFAQ
RepCheck and Message Recall are complementary but distinct pharmaceutical research methodologies. RepCheck studies assess how well physicians know your products overall—their familiarity with therapeutic indications, clinical efficacy, safety profile, and willingness to recommend the medication as primary therapy. RepCheck evaluates the general effectiveness of your medical representatives in building product awareness and physician confidence.
Message Recall studies, however, focus specifically on whether physicians remember particular key messages you’ve created—specific clinical benefits, competitive advantages, patient population recommendations, or clinical evidence points. While RepCheck measures broad product knowledge, Message Recall measures precise message penetration. Together, these studies provide a complete picture: RepCheck tells you if physicians know your products, while Message Recall reveals if they remember the specific messages you want them to communicate to patients.
RepCheck and Message Recall studies are essential investments for pharmaceutical companies because they directly measure return on investment in medical representative programs and marketing communication efforts.
First, they provide objective evidence about whether your medical representatives are effectively communicating key product messages to physicians—critical information for optimizing training and field force productivity.
Second, they identify knowledge gaps among target physicians that prevent product recommendations, enabling you to refocus marketing efforts and representative interactions.
Third, they reveal which key messages physicians actually remember and which require reinforcement or repositioning, guiding more effective communication strategy.
Fourth, they quantify competitive messaging advantage by comparing your message recall against competitor products in the same therapeutic category.
Finally, Message Recall and RepCheck studies reduce business risk by validating that your marketing investments drive actual physician awareness and message retention—not just exposure—making informed decisions about resource allocation. For pharmaceutical companies, these studies translate marketing spending into measurable outcomes that impact prescription volume and market share.
We employ multiple validation strategies to ensure our RepCheck and Message Recall findings reflect authentic physician knowledge and representative impact. First, we recruit physician respondents from our qualified healthcare professional panel and verify their specialty, practice setting, and patient volume to ensure they match your target market.
Second, we use validated research methodologies developed specifically for pharmaceutical market research, with standardized question formats that enable comparison with industry benchmarks and historical data.
Third, we structure our questionnaires to assess both aided and unaided message recall—asking physicians what they remember spontaneously without prompting, then providing message cues to measure recognition—which provides more realistic assessment of actual message penetration.
Fourth, we cross-reference physician responses about medical representative interactions with representative activity data when available, to correlate claimed message delivery with actual physician exposure and engagement.
Finally, we conduct longitudinal tracking studies comparing RepCheck and Message Recall metrics over time to validate that changes in physician awareness correlate with changes in medical representative activity and prescription behavior. This multi-layered validation approach ensures our research findings accurately reflect real-world physician knowledge and medical representative effectiveness.
Blog
ALL articles